Archive for Roundabout

Is it time to revisit the Roundabout Issue?

Articles continue to flood the media about the merits of traffic roundabouts that increase public safety, save fuel and more efficiently handle traffic flow. An additional benefit of a roundabout is that they force motorists to slow down on approach and ‘calm’ traffic flow. Both Butler and Warren counties are continuing to add roundabouts.

It is my opinion, it is not too late for Columbia Township and Mariemont to revisit the feasibility for a roundabout at Murray and Plainville. This five or six way intersection is confusing to motorists and pedestrians alike and calls into play real safety concerns. Why a roundabout at this location was opposed initially is a mystery to me and most everyone I have talked to. Maybe someone can shed some light on why this community improvement was initially voted down even as it was fully funded with public monies.

Further commentary by Rick Greiwe

roundabout_new

Benefits of Roundabouts

This 11 minute YouTube video from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) shows how a Roundabout facilitates traffic flow, pedestrian crossings and safety. This look into the future of traffic management is worth viewing for all drivers.  This should allay the concerns some may have had regarding  the proposed roundabout at Murray in Mariemont and the planned roundabout at Bramble in Columbia Township.

 

Opportunities Squandered by Village Officials–By Mike Lemon

Opportunities Squandered by Village Officials–By Mike Lemon 

As a 34-year Mariemont resident, former Mariemont mayor and current Columbia Township
administrator, I have had my feet planted in both communities for many years.  Most recently I was involved in two recent failed projects that could have easily delivered significant financial opportunities for both Mariemont and Columbia Township, had it not been for the questionable judgment of our Village officials. As a concerned Mariemont resident, I believe it is important for all Village residents to understand the facts of what happened so that we can all hold our Village officials accountable for their actions.

The two recent projects I am referring to are: 1) the proposed improvement at the 6-way intersection of Plainville, Madisonville and Settle Roads (commonly referred to as the roundabout project; and 2) the Joint Economic Development Zone (JEDZ). Together, these projects had the potential of generating millions of dollars for the Village of Mariemont without any new tax increases to Village residents. However, our Village officials declined to participate or engage in negotiations on either project.

The “Mayor’s Bulletin” of August 2013 provided the Mariemont mayor’s slant on the reasons for Mariemont officials rejecting both projects. Unfortunately, much of the information contained in that bulletin is misrepresented, incomplete, or inaccurate. Attempting to address each point in the mayor’s report would require too much space to set the record straight and only lead to more bulletins and wasting of taxpayer’s dollars. However, there are several observations I would like to share.

Six-way Intersection Improvement – A $1.7 Million Grant from the OKI Regional Council of Governments

As the Columbia administrator, I observed Columbia Township act in good faith, seeking a collaborative, cooperative approach to this project. I also observed Trustee David Kubicki’s repeated attempts to engage with Mariemont officials in negotiations continually stonewalled. After many meetings and phone calls, Mr. Kubicki even challenged our officials to take the $1.7 million grant the township received and design its preferred intersection improvement, but Mariemont officials would not even recommend or consider a new design. In the end, the Township had no choice but to relinquish any improvement which would have been entirely paid for by Columbia Township’s grant. Columbia Township is now moving the roundabout concept to Bramble and Plainville and leaving the financial fate of the six-way intersection and entry into the Village solely in Mariemont officials’ hands.

Joint Economic Development Zone (JEDZ) – A Multi-Million Dollar Revenue Opportunity

Columbia Township made it known early in discussions with Mariemont officials that it was important to get the JEDZ issue on the ballot in November. Knowing this, Trustee Kubicki personally expended a considerable amount of energy and time trying to engage our Mariemont officials. Trustee Kubicki even offered to go to a council meeting and discuss the JEDZ. He was warned by the mayor, who advised Mr. Kubicki that he would only be allowed three minutes to talk, not to attend. After four months of phone calls, meetings and discussions without progress toward an agreement, and with time to get the issue on the ballot growing perilously short, the Township received a peculiar letter from the mayor asking for a written proposal! This led Columbia Township officials to conclude that Mariemont was not really interested in collaborating or partnering in an agreement, but only stonewalling again. As a result, the Township began discussions with other communities, while still holding open the offer to accept a proposal from Mariemont. Despite efforts by councilmen Cortney Scheeser and Jeff Andrews to schedule a special council meeting to discuss the issue (before Columbia Township signed an agreement with another community), a council vote was taken and failed by 4-2, effectively abandoning the opportunity to partner in a JEDZ. Within 10 days, Fairfax and Columbia Township had completed negotiations and agreed to form a partnership on a JEDZ.

While the “Mayor’s Bulletin” stated the Township was only willing to give the Village 10% of the revenue collected (as evidenced by the agreement with Fairfax), I know the truth is that discussions took place with Mariemont officials for figures up to 50%, although not all the township trustees were aligned on that amount. Indications from the trustees were the figure was more likely to be 20-30% in an agreement, plus repayment for the expenses for collecting taxes. There would be absolutely NO cost to Mariemont, only revenue to use as it wished.

Columbia Township officials have been accused by Mariemont officials of withholding information. Nothing could be further from the truth. All information available was provided by me to the Village, and nothing was held back. The projections on revenue from the JEDZ were completed by an economic development professional, using methodologies commonly used in industry. Explanations of how the figures were derived were also provided by the same development professional in a meeting with Mariemont officials. Conservative figures indicted the JEDZ would generate approximately $706,000 annually. Based upon the intent of a 40-year agreement with three 10-year renewal options (as signed with Fairfax), our community lost an opportunity to capture revenue for the next seventy years for any purpose it wished! How much it lost depends upon what the negotiated split would have been and the cost of tax collection. However, based upon a quick spreadsheet analysis, the following chart reflects the range of revenue lost if a 1.0% earnings tax and a 5% tax collection fee of generated revenue are used. (If a 1.25% earnings tax (the current Mariemont rate) had been negotiated, the impact would show an even more significant loss for Mariemont.)

% Split 90-10 80-20 70-30 60-40 50-50
Est. Revenue $706,378 $706,378 $706,378 $706,378 $706,378
Collection Fee (5%) $35,319 $35,319 $35,319 $35,319 $35,319
Net $671,059 $671,059 $671,059 $671,059 $671,059
           
CT Annual Share $603,953 $536,847 $469,741 $402,635 $335,530
MM Annual Share $67,106 $134,212 $201,318 $268,424 $335,530
           
MM Loss-70 Yrs. $4,697,414 $9,394,827 $14,092,241 $18,789,655 $23,487,069

If the percentage our Village received was between 20-30%, this equates to between $9 million and $14 million dollars of free money lost!

The Lost Opportunity for Our Village

So what could have happened if an agreement was reached on these two initiatives?  We could have…

  • Increased our Village revenue by millions of dollars without increasing taxes to residents and businesses. (What would these millions of dollars have done for improving our streets, for improving parks and the pool, for police protection, for fire protection and more? Would it pay for a community comprehensive plan or for a Village administrator?)
  • Replaced six-way confusing intersection with improved design and new entry into our Village at no cost to Mariemont
  • Provided pathway and design for extension of bike path from Fairfax
  • Extended the customer base for our retail and commercial businesses in Mariemont through development of Plainville Road and Wooster Pike.

 

I saw these two projects as a tremendous opportunity for Columbia Township and the Village of Mariemont to work together to accomplish three things…

  • Improve two adjacent communities
  • Support economic development
  • Help stabilize finances following the severe impact of State cut-backs and estate tax elimination.

However, our Mariemont Village officials decided that these projects were not in the best interest of Mariemont and declined to participate. While there are obviously differences of opinion on these two projects, one has to wonder what is really driving the decisions of our Village officials and whether they are in the long-term best interest of Mariemont and its residents. In the meantime, I know Columbia Township is putting this episode behind it and is moving forward with its plans to improve the township. I also know that Columbia Township will continue to collaborate with surrounding communities when it can, and I know it will certainly include Mariemont when possible.

Having served the Mariemont community for 13-years as a councilman and mayor and as a long-time Mariemont resident, just thinking of the lost opportunities is very distressing to me.  I hope you are as disturbed as I am and will begin to take a closer look at the current leadership and how it is managing the long-term interests of our Village.

Click here for more information regarding the JEDZ legislation

Click here for the Mayor’s August Bulletin

By Mike Lemon

Case For A Roundabout

A Case For A Roundabout

Roundabouts are an important design element of the English Garden City. In fact, the Village Square was once a roundabout before traffic signals. So why not consider one to improve the complicated sixway intersection at Murray and Plainville?

After examining the four alternatives (no build, four way stop, four way signal and roundabout). Studied by KZF at the request of the Village, a roundabout is the most effective solution to the traffic back-up problem. The reason my company wants to address this issue is twofold. The final phase of our development in Mariemont is directly across from the tennis courts and the front door of this project is a parking lot of cars on Madisonville Road during the morning rush hour. Secondly, if my company pursues an apartment community in Madison Place, it will be designed to create a village atmosphere with buildings close to the street. The afternoon back up on Plainville negatively impacts this site as well.

The benefits of a roundabout to the residents of Mariemont are many. The roundabout extends the 20 mph school zone on both Plainville and Madisonville roads restricting the speed by the way it’s designed, adds green space to Mary Emery Park by moving Madisonville Road north, solves the bike path route through the intersection and provides a clear and safe pedestrian crossing for both north/south and east/west directions. The roundabout would also create a beautiful gateway on the north side of Mariemont at no cost to the Village.

The roundabout will attract additional investment in the Madison Place neighborhood and stabilize the property values on the northern boarder of Mariemont. New residents will be within walking distance of the Village  quare and will have disposable income to support the new theatre expansion, restaurants, shops and services.

The total real estate valuation of our four phases in Mariemont will be $68 million when we are sold out. The new real estate taxes to the Village and the School District, along with the spending of the new residents have been very beneficial to Mariemont. Simple put, the roundabout promotes new development and progress. Sincerely,

Richard J. Greiwe

Greiwe Signature

 

 

Greiwe Development

 

ColumbiaTwp-Roundabout
Six Way Stop Proposal

Traffic Calming Options Considered for 6-Way Intersection

The entrance to the Village of Mariemont to the north is a six-way intersection where Plainville, Murray and Madisonville Road converge. At a presentation in early February, Jonathan Wiley, a transportation engineer with KZF Design, presented several options that aim to improve the flow of traffic at that intersection. In the fall, KZF engineers studied traffic patterns through the intersection and then modeled six different revisions. The two options that were the most feasible came down to a roundabout or traffic lights. Mr. Wiley stated that the current intersection does not meet today’s standards for keeping traffic moving. He acknowledged that there have been very few accidents at the intersection, and attributes it to the fact that drivers go very slowly because it is confusing and difficult to determine who should proceed next. Given all the factors, KZF determined that a roundabout is the best option for keeping traffic moving, with speeds of 18-20 miles per hour through the intersection.

Attending the presentation were representatives from businesses, the Mariemont School Board, Columbia Township, Mariemont Council, and other interested parties. Mike Lemon, Administrator of Columbia Township, spoke in favor of the roundabout as a way to improve the traffic flow and the look of the area. He reminded the group that roundabouts are common in England, and Mariemont is modeled after an English garden city.  Most of the affected land lies in Columbia

Township, but there is a 10-foot easement in the Village

of Mariemont that is affected by the roundabout and a proposed bike path, and so they are seeking cooperation from the Village.

Future traffic through the area was considered, to take into account increased traffic from Emery Park and Nolen Park condominiums, as well as a proposed apartment complex. Traffic engineers estimate an eventual 15% increase in traffic and their models show that both the traffic signal plan and the roundabout plan can handle future growth. KZF estimates construction of a roundabout would take 2-3 months, with traffic maintained. Installing traffic signals would be a much easier process. Installing traffic lights was not considered the best option, however, because speed through the intersection would be fairly high (30 mph) on Plainville when the lights are green. The engineers see the roundabout plan, with “splitter islands” as also being safer for pedestrians, since they would be able to cross one lane, pause at the island and then cross another lane, reducing their exposure.

KZF has presented their findings to the five member Planning Commission that will vote sometime in March and then present the final determination to Council.

zp8497586rq